Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
p2pnet Digests
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
Teksavvy
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Are downloads ‘buys’?

p2p news / p2pnet: There are quite a few discussions in various forums about what you can or can’t do with music which you’ve paid for through services such as iTunes.

A question that needs to be answered is: are they “purchasing” the music in the way they do a CD which has first-sale rights (the right to loan or resell)? Or are they, as some of the conditions of these music services imply, only licensing the music for very specific uses (which could be personal use by the person who paid)?

The US courts will be contemplating this question in the case launched by Rock bands Cheap Trick and The Allman Brothers Band against Sony Music. Their intention is for this to be a class action suit including thousands of artists who are being short-changed by the major labels.

From the International Herald Tribune:

According to the suit, the record company is treating digital downloads like traditional record sales, rather than licensed music, triggering a different royalty deal.

The case was launched in the United States District Court in Manhattan on April 27.

I’m looking for more details on this case as I think it will help clarify some very interesting questions about digital music.

Personally, I have a hard time paying $.99/song for a limiting license when I could pay less to get a CD which offers me far more rights.

I suspect this case will expose the lower value of music download services compared to CDs and thus either kill that market, or cause a market correction in pricing.

Russell McOrmond - p2pnet contributing editor
[McOrmond is an independent author (software and non-software) who uses modern business models and licensing (Free/Libre and Open Source Software, Creative Commons). He’s also the CLUE policy coordinator.]

Digg this story.

HOME

2 Responses to “Are downloads ‘buys’?”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Gosh, record lables tring to cheat their own talent? It’s just so hard to believe…

    Downloads are licensed music where the consumer is concerned but are considered purchases when it comes to the lables paying royalties to artists. How convienient. Not surprizing. The lables have consistantly shown themselves to be scammers of the lowest order for much longer than most music fans have been alive.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    it’s unlikely anything will change because mainscream media won’t report anything about this case, unless of course the labels win

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Blubster
MP3rocket