Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Traffic shaping

p2p news / p2pnet: Jack Kapica of the Globe and Mail introduces the "net neutrality".

Bandwidth shaping is shaping up to be a bitter fight, promises Philippa Lawson of the University of Ottawa’s Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. "It’s nothing less than a battle for the future of the Internet."

I sent in the following letter to the editor which explains my views.

The debate over traffic shaping is like the debate over other technical measures. The question needs to be: who owns the thing that the technical measure is being applied to, and is the technical measure protecting the interests of the owner or protecting the interests of a third party.

The person sending information over the Internet should be able to determine, based on their own convictions, which information should get priority. I would prioritize my own voice traffic over email since email can withstand the delay. The ISP should be allowed to charge me more if I flag packets as needing to be delivered faster, but should not legally be allowed to set the policy. It should be the two endpoints in an Internet communication, and nobody else, that sets the policy for traffic shaping.

This is as it should be for technical measures and copyright. While a copyright holder should be allowed to encode their content in the format of their choice, they should not be allowed to apply technical measures to devices that the public owns. Existing competition policy demands they not be allowed to tie the enjoyment of their content to specific brands of devices where the manufacturer has applied a technical measure to the device. We own the devices, not the copyright holders or the manufacturers, and these devices should only have technical measures which obey the owners’ policy.

Russell McOrmondp2pnet contributing editor
[McOrmond is an independent author (software and non-software) who uses modern business models and licensing (Free/Libre and Open Source Software, Creative Commons). He's also the CLUE policy coordinator.]

Digg this story.

Also See:
net neutralityJockeying on the Net fast lane, June 23, 2006


p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

2 Responses to “Traffic shaping”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    It would be like charging people to ride the elevators in public buildings. Can’t afford it? Take the stairs.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    You are 100% correct!

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®