The Libertarians are equally a poor substitute for Democrates. NOT a real choice between those two, either.

RESEARCH these two ‘Substitutes’ THOUROUGHLY and you’ll see what I mean. You’ll also see that voting for either one of these parties only takes votes from both the Republicans and the Democrats.

It’s sad that we don’t REALLY have ANY good choices at all. What we NEED to do is research THOUROUGHLY each and every CANDIDATE we vote for…within the Republican/Democratic system and CLEAN them UP!!! Only then will we have a chance of getting OUR Country back.

Otherwise, the only other ‘alternative’ is the status quo. OR a party such as Ross Perot tried to start but was thwarted when it gained enough momentum to “threaten” the ’status quo’ so much so that said ’status quo’ told Ross to drop out or lose the lives of his family and himself and all of his businesses. This type of behavior by the ’status quo’ is why we will alway have them to deal with.

I don’t see #1 (or any of its’ sub-sections) happening any time soon. Let’s hope (yeah right) that the American public will have regained some small measure of sanity come late 2008. ”

I doubt it.
We’ll all just vote Democrat, just to keep Bush out, which will
keep the status quo exactly where it is now.
There are 2 corporate parties, not one.
God we’re stupid.

1.- When the “War” on terrorism is finally won. At about the same time, the U.S shall have won the War on booze (a.k.a. “Prohibition”), the War on drugs (see “Prohibition”), and the War on “immorality”. What has Dubya been smoking?

2.- When Dubya and others (of which there are MANY!) of his ilk are thrown (voted) the HE** out of office, and some semblence of sanity returns to American social & legal society.

I don’t see #1 (or any of its’ sub-sections) happening any time soon. Let’s hope (yeah right) that the American public will have regained some small measure of sanity come late 2008.

But it’s not just the US…this is a Global thing…

I ran into this while ‘trolling’ CNet News:

>Reader post by: appletoys
Posted on: June 22, 2006, 4:03 PM PDT
Story: AT&T revises privacy policy

The European Commission has just
announced an agreement whereby English will be the
official language of the European Union rather than
German,which was the other possibility. As part of
the negotiations, the British Government conceded
that English spelling had some room for improvement
and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would
become known as “Euro-English”.

In the first year, “s” will replace the soft “c”.
Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump
with joy. The hard “c” will be dropped in favour of
“k”. This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards
kan have one less letter.There will be growing
publik enthusiasm.

In the sekond year when the troublesome “ph” will
be replaced with “f”. This will make words like
fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new
spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where
more komplikated changes are possible.

Government will enkourage the removal of double
letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate
speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of> the silent
“e” in the languag is disgrasful and it
should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps
such as replasing “th” with “z” and “w” with
“v”.
During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary “o” kan be dropd
from vords kontaining “ou” and after ziz fifz yer,
ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no
mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi
tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil
finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German
like zey vunted in zeforst plas.

If zis mad you smil, pleas pas on to oza pep<

N 1 hnd zs cmpzsn iz fner zan hl…bt n z ozr zs iz NT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THINK about it………………….