Comments on: IM icon lands student in trouble

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:58:55 +0000

Hey now! I did blow up a teachers car once. *snicker*. She never accused me of cheating at chemistry again. Haha!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 07:34:10 +0000

blowing a car and an icon are…. black & white. Easier to get into flight school w/o landing lessons, no one bugs you for that… BUT DoN’T U DARE MAKE AN ICON u sick bugger!!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 04:57:05 +0000

Actually, some psychology is sound, but oversensitive shit like this, analyzing everything into the smallest bit is just another form of being anal.. yes you heard me, BEING ANAL!

What?… you thought psychologists were immune?
Hardly, they’re amongst the most weakest against all these
forms of illness, because their mind gets challenged each and every day!

This kid was probably just out to blow off some steam, hell, I even contemplated blowing up a teachers car once, when she accused me wrongly of cheating on an assignment!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:55:44 +0000

One other thing, from the article:
>>>
A psychologist concluded the student wasn’t a threat but he, “did commit the act of threatening a teacher, in violation of page 11 of the student handbook, creating an environment threatening the health, safety and welfare of others, and his actions created disruption in the school environment,” ruled the school district’s hearing officer.
<<<

Leave it to school-board PTA types to get their panties wet feeling important and powerful overreacting to normal teenage behavior. And they wonder why most kids give up on participation in this society by about age 15. Look at the so-called adults they are exposed to, they begin to think everyone out in the real world is just as retarded and give up.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:45:29 +0000

The reason the student did not have criminal reprocussions was because the ‘kill teacher’ statement was sent to a classmate and it was NOT INTENDED TO BE DELIVERED to the target of the statement.

In the eyes of the law, and logic, a threat is only a threat when it is intentionally delivered to the target. You might say the student made a threat if he had the expectation that his classmate would eventually deliver the message to the teacher, but that’s a bit of a stretch.

Now, perhaps if he had truly intended to cause harm to this teacher and was instructing his friend to do something criminal, there might be conspiracy-related crimes, but no threatening.

This teacher sounds like one of those hyper-sensitive metro-sexual fem-men that are all too comon these days. Probably went home and cryed in mommy, I mean wifey’s lap.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 01 Jul 2006 19:54:50 +0000

….Mean while Samir is in a florida flight school not wanting to learn how to land….