<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google page-ranking row</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9258/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9258</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9258/comment-page-1#comment-59296</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59296</guid>
		<description>[QUOTE]The best way to get a good ranking with Google is to offer something of value so that many other sites will link to yours. Link spamming won&#039;t get you there, neither will whinging. [/QUOTE]

erm, what was that all about?  Link spamming?  Sometimes I wonder why I comment here... repsonses are sometimes, sub par to say the least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[QUOTE]The best way to get a good ranking with Google is to offer something of value so that many other sites will link to yours. Link spamming won&#8217;t get you there, neither will whinging. [/QUOTE]</p>
<p>erm, what was that all about?  Link spamming?  Sometimes I wonder why I comment here&#8230; repsonses are sometimes, sub par to say the least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9258/comment-page-1#comment-58853</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58853</guid>
		<description>Hardly.  If Kinderstart is a competitor to Google, then why does it need a Google ranking?  Is it admitting that as a competitor it can&#039;t compete?  Did it have a contract with Google to ensure a high ranking?

The best way to get a good ranking with Google is to offer something of value so that many other sites will link to yours.  Link spamming won&#039;t get you there, neither will whinging.

--Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly.  If Kinderstart is a competitor to Google, then why does it need a Google ranking?  Is it admitting that as a competitor it can&#8217;t compete?  Did it have a contract with Google to ensure a high ranking?</p>
<p>The best way to get a good ranking with Google is to offer something of value so that many other sites will link to yours.  Link spamming won&#8217;t get you there, neither will whinging.</p>
<p>&#8211;Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9258/comment-page-1#comment-58642</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58642</guid>
		<description>heh, now a big company can claim that &#039;practicing a form censorship by limiting it&#039;s competions exposure to the public&#039; is protected under the first amendment?

First disney now this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, now a big company can claim that &#8216;practicing a form censorship by limiting it&#8217;s competions exposure to the public&#8217; is protected under the first amendment?</p>
<p>First disney now this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
