Comments on: Nasty questions http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9326 p2pnet.net - reader powered Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:27:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9326/comment-page-1#comment-64363 Reader's Write Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:57:02 +0000 #comment-64363 What is always said is that they are suing people for file sharing. That is not what they are doing. They are also suing people who shared nothing and taking there money which "is" a crime. Think about it. When they knowingly sue someone who shared nothing this means that the court documents are perjury, it is a false claim against someone, When the person pays for sharing nothing it actually becomes theft by contract. They are making a high number of mistakes when they sue. They intend for those mistakes to pay like anyone else. Where they sue an innocent person it becomes a criminal offense. I was sued by a satellite company and when they learned they had made a mistake they were quick to make a settlement under the threat of driving me broke through litigation costs. Settle for a confidently agreement or go broke? They committed crimes which were provable and the government refuses to enforce the crimes even when they know they targeted the wrong person. It is a crime to make up a story to the court about someone in an attempt to get the court to take there money. The person can do little against the high litigation cost but to give in to the illegal demands. Where innocent people are targeted intentionally for profit and the justice system fails to protect, then there is little people can do but to remove the matter from the court system which assists in awarding money from innocent people. Focus has to shift to their taking money from those where there was no evidence and mistakes were made. It is this segment which makes what they are doing illegal;. What is always said is that they are suing people for file sharing. That is not what they are doing. They are also suing people who shared nothing and taking there money which “is” a crime. Think about it. When they knowingly sue someone who shared nothing this means that the court documents are perjury, it is a false claim against someone, When the person pays for sharing nothing it actually becomes theft by contract.
They are making a high number of mistakes when they sue. They intend for those mistakes to pay like anyone else. Where they sue an innocent person it becomes a criminal offense.
I was sued by a satellite company and when they learned they had made a mistake they were quick to make a settlement under the threat of driving me broke through litigation costs. Settle for a confidently agreement or go broke? They committed crimes which were provable and the government refuses to enforce the crimes even when they know they targeted the wrong person. It is a crime to make up a story to the court about someone in an attempt to get the court to take there money. The person can do little against the high litigation cost but to give in to the illegal demands.
Where innocent people are targeted intentionally for profit and the justice system fails to protect, then there is little people can do but to remove the matter from the court system which assists in awarding money from innocent people.

Focus has to shift to their taking money from those where there was no evidence and mistakes were made. It is this segment which makes what they are doing illegal;.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9326/comment-page-1#comment-63682 Reader's Write Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:06:31 +0000 #comment-63682 "Has any money collected from your lawsuits gone to pay actual artists?" This raises a dilemma for artists. If artists do not get a share of the money made by the record labels regardless of the method used by the label, then that is unfair to the artists that has an expectancy to profit from their record's income. But if artists get part of the money obtained through lawsuits to the artist fans, then the artiss is benefiting from the dirty business of someone suing their fans. Eventially this wull hurt the artists. Artists should unite and demand that the money be returned to their fans and that the lawsuits end. Else the industry they depend on may go up in smoke. Rafael Venegas http://www.gvenegas.com “Has any money collected from your lawsuits gone to pay actual artists?”

This raises a dilemma for artists.

If artists do not get a share of the money made by the record labels regardless of the method used by the label, then that is unfair to the artists that has an expectancy to profit from their record’s income.

But if artists get part of the money obtained through lawsuits to the artist fans, then the artiss is benefiting from the dirty business of someone suing their fans. Eventially this wull hurt the artists.

Artists should unite and demand that the money be returned to their fans and that the lawsuits end. Else the industry they depend on may go up in smoke.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9326/comment-page-1#comment-63392 Reader's Write Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:53:15 +0000 #comment-63392 "2.The RIAA has sued over 20,000 music fans for file sharing, who have on average paid a $3,750 settlement. That's over $75,000,000." Music publisher do this all the time. Why, a music publisher may sell their catalog of songs for millions of dollars without approval of the beneficial owners of rhe songs (the songwriters) and, for salt in the wound, not a cent is shared with the the songwriters. And where is the songwrite's associations or societies? They work for the publishers (some of which even have seats in the board of directors in the alleged songwriter societies). Rafael Venegas http://www.gvenegas.com “2.The RIAA has sued over 20,000 music fans for file sharing, who have on average paid a $3,750 settlement. That’s over $75,000,000.”

Music publisher do this all the time. Why, a music publisher may sell their catalog of songs for millions of dollars without approval of the beneficial owners of rhe songs (the songwriters) and, for salt in the wound, not a cent is shared with the the songwriters.

And where is the songwrite’s associations or societies? They work for the publishers (some of which even have seats in the board of directors in the alleged songwriter societies).

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

]]>