<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap Paramount movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9329/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9329</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9329/comment-page-1#comment-63260</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-63260</guid>
		<description>âJudge Makiko Takabe rejecting Paramount&#039;s claims that its products that had entered the public domain are retroactively subject to patent protection for 20 more years under the new law, Kyodo said.â

A neophyte lawyer could have told Paramount that laws cannot be retroactive.

But, the retroactivity of copyright has been applied to copyright routinely. How they (the music publisher cartels) get away with it is beyond me. This is how Mickey Mouse is still under alleged copyright. RETROACTIVITY OF THE LAW, A  (USA) CONTITUTIONALLY WRONG CONCEPT.

Het, Mickey Mouse is now free, in the public domain, at last, at least in Japan.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

Rafael Venegas


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>âJudge Makiko Takabe rejecting Paramount&#8217;s claims that its products that had entered the public domain are retroactively subject to patent protection for 20 more years under the new law, Kyodo said.â</p>
<p>A neophyte lawyer could have told Paramount that laws cannot be retroactive.</p>
<p>But, the retroactivity of copyright has been applied to copyright routinely. How they (the music publisher cartels) get away with it is beyond me. This is how Mickey Mouse is still under alleged copyright. RETROACTIVITY OF THE LAW, A  (USA) CONTITUTIONALLY WRONG CONCEPT.</p>
<p>Het, Mickey Mouse is now free, in the public domain, at last, at least in Japan.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
<p>Rafael Venegas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


