Comments on: Sharman drops p2pnet libel case

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:16:15 +0000

-= Disclaimer: This is just my opinion. =-
- As such I’m NOT suggesting any comment -
- following this preface is true. In fact -
- I live in a fairy-tale and nothing I -
- say should be taken seriously. -

She is attempting to drain Jon’s finances and support, and
make him say ..”uncle” using an obviously meritless suit.
This opens the door for a countersuit tho.
She has tried numerous times to show that she is .. heh .. broke,
therefore limiting the amount Jon could get in a countersuit,
IF she sues as an individual. If Sharman remained party to the suit,
their large financial base leaves a bigger target for a countersuit.

By removing themselves ( in NAME ) they remove the incentive to
countersue, even though they can fully back Nikki with cash, and
limit their financial and name exposure. It a work of genius.

Legal extortion is an amazing technique.

In the meantime,
Please, no one worry about Sharman “coming to get” readers and
posters of this site. First off, P2Pnet does not keep ANY IP info to
give them. Ans second, The previous poster gave us a wonderful
example of why this won’t happen in Canada, with real case examples.

If the goal is to frighten people away from this site, it has failed.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:29:16 +0000

Since the topic of IP and the owner of the IP is being brought up… figured i would add my out-take on it.

1. When CRIA went to court a couple of years ago to get those MP3 trader identities from sympatico, telus, rogers and videotron (did i leave an ISP out?) Court ruled against it citing the IP does not prove WHO the person was behind the IP. At most it can ONLY show WHO pays the ISP.

2. Hence, even if someone did give the IP of whatever doe/roe, It does NOT prove who the person was. As was already ruled in court.

3. matter of fact, I recall opening a proxy on my computer for 12 anon posters here, and at this very moment i’m on an anon proxy. Sue me pls.

The roe/doe claims hold no water at all, and if the bitch and kaza (who distribute an abundance of malware with their kaza program) think it does in canada or were led to believe so by a moron lawyer then let them try.

This IS probably why it was dropped, it holds no water or burden of proof.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:23:30 +0000

And since Jon has NO ip info on anyone, the method
isn’t just madness …

It’s worthless.

The posters here are safe, since NO IP information is kept
by this site .. ever.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:48:09 +0000

I take it back, your are not stupid, I am.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:41:58 +0000

“When Jon wrote that they are coming after the posters he meant just that. ”

Source please

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:34:21 +0000

The fact that I called you stupid should not have brought you to conclude that you should not be worried from a real debate coming from me. And if we are on this subject, based on your words, why is it that you feel you should, in general, be worried from a real debate?

Now to the stupid remarks you made before.
When Jon wrote that they are coming after the posters he meant just that. If Sharman would succeed in this case and make a precedent against the (alleged) one poster then basically this would intimidate other posters and they would think twice before posting any wording againt Sharman, and for that matter against any other company who would use that precedent to sue posters.
So basically the actions taken by Sharman against one poster is an action against other posters, hence the use of that word in a plural.

If you still find it hard to understand the above obvious explanation please feel free to post here again, I am at your service.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:57:46 +0000

Once again …

Wrong …

READ CAREFULLY …

“TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, Sharman Networks Limited, wholly discontinues this proceeding against the Defendants John Newton, Interserver Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe, Richard Roe and Jane Roe. ”

Sharman dropped out.

Nikki is going after ONE SPECIFIC POSTER …

Now .. READ CAREFULLY …

“TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, Nikki Hemming, wholly discontinues this proceeding against the Defendants John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. ”

Continuing against Jon .. AND ONE POSTER .. Richard Roe.

This does not translate to ..

“which means they are still coming after posters! ”

She is going after one specific poster.

As for …

“so as Jon claimed they are coming after the posters. ”

Wrong.

As Jon has mentioned .. the OUTCOME of this case has very
large ramifications, as it applies to free speech on the net.
He has never said “OMG WTF they are comin to get us .. !!”

This statement ..

“they havent dropped against “Richard Roe” which means they are still coming after posters! ”

is actually yours, and yours alone.

It seems calculated to convince the posters here that Sharman
is coming after everyone who posts on this site.
Fearmongering, basically.
And, not true .. and you know it

It is precisely because I ( and nearly every regualr reader here )
am NOT stupid that I recognize an attempt at fear spreading for
what it is

Besides, if the only counterpoint you can come up with is
to call me “stupid” … I honestly am not worried about any
form of real debate coming from you.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:15:50 +0000

Richard Roe is the unkown poster, so as Jon claimed they are coming after the posters.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:51:52 +0000

“very expensive lawyers”

Not always good lawyers. Just better connected within the jusdicial-lawyer buddy system. It is the connection that is expensive.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:13:18 +0000

” they havent dropped against “Richard Roe” which means they are still coming after posters! ”

Wrong …

Read carefully …

Notice the name .. Richard Roe .. included in the list of those
folks in which the proceedings have been dropped by Sharman networks.
In NAME, at least, Sharman is no longer suing anyone.

Now, Read again …

“TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, Nikki Hemming, wholly discontinues this proceeding against the Defendants John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. ”

Only Jon, and Richard Roe are left off the “Nikki” list.
She is not “coming after posters!”. I wonder why you would
want readers to think that … hmmm

Sharman is probably only out of the suit in name only, and still completely backing Nikki, offstage. It protects what name they
have left, while leaving a somewhat smaller financial target for
a countersuit. It’s kind of like hiring a homeless person to file
a frivolous lawsuit. If the Homeless person loses and gets
countersued, the cash award is likely to be less ( nothing to
take ). Clever … and common.

No one knows how to steal using the law better than corporate
entities.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:36:47 +0000

If Sharman has dropped the case but Hemming has maintained the case, there is going to be more, way more. These people are very very experienced when using the court system and they have very expensive lawyers. Maybe they have discovered the does, but notice things carefully:\’+ they havent dropped against \”Richard Roe\” which means they are still coming after posters!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:19:31 +0000

“Personally i’d update the images first of all, the p2pnet is being sued by Sharman is just a tad incorrect now ”

Maybe
Maybe not.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:28:16 +0000

lol, that s quite a good idea

Personally i’d update the images first of all, the p2pnet is being sued by Sharman is just a tad incorrect now

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:34:00 +0000

i am itai, the magical, mystical lawyer from israel.

i am nikki, the bee-aaatch from down under.

i am a troll. forget me and move on.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:15:48 +0000

I think there should be a kaza ad here.

………with the link pointing to the .edu report on how it is badware and installs all sorts of spyware

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:02:25 +0000

Nikki Hemming is in love with Jon Newton and desparately seeks his attention. That’s what this is all about. She envies Jon for him being everything that she is not. He is a man who stands up for what he believes in. She has no principle and is only motivated by greed. In her gilded money mansion she has found that she has no friends and no supporters. I guess money by itself can’t buy you happiness.

She must read this site daily and while realizing that Jon Newton is a principled man who does well for filesharers, her own legacy with Sharman Networks by contrast has been overseeing the largest poison ever spread upon the computers of people with the Kazaa program. Jon Newton is a happy man raising a family and building a better future for all of us. That will be his legacy. Allah willing, Nikki Hemming will die barren, for nothing good can come out of her cursed womb. I hope she dies alone in her money mansion surrounded with her treasures.

Nikki you ought to just kill yourself right now. YOU ARE A WASTE OF LIFE.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:05:14 +0000

is it so bad that you have to conserve electricity and use an oil lamp?

or has the genie in that lamp just granted you your first wish?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:18:12 +0000

Just take one day at a time. And this has been a good day.

Hopefully Hemming’s action will soon follow the same path.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:21:10 +0000

Ok let them blow it out of their ass.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:00:38 +0000

“how could there be any costs, John had an ambulance chaser working on contingency, only the libelled party had any costs”

LOLOLOLOLOL ROFL haaahaaahaaahaahaahaaahaaaaa
hee heeeeeeelolololololol *gasp*

LOLOLOL HAAHAAAAAAAMUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA