<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad supported content &#8212;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9338/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9338</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:08:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9338/comment-page-1#comment-64580</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-64580</guid>
		<description>Ad supported content will go nowhere if ads are not watched or are absorbed less and if ads do not sell. Each day that passes ads are watched less, absobed less and sell less consumer goods. 

What sells is quality, good reviews, neutral party, word of mouth  recommendations and of course, low prices.

If GM had spent their ad dollars on making better cars, their story would be altogether different and would not be near bankuptcy. As Lincoln said, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. All ads do is pretend to fool the people and the people have realized it.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad supported content will go nowhere if ads are not watched or are absorbed less and if ads do not sell. Each day that passes ads are watched less, absobed less and sell less consumer goods. </p>
<p>What sells is quality, good reviews, neutral party, word of mouth  recommendations and of course, low prices.</p>
<p>If GM had spent their ad dollars on making better cars, their story would be altogether different and would not be near bankuptcy. As Lincoln said, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. All ads do is pretend to fool the people and the people have realized it.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9338/comment-page-1#comment-64391</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-64391</guid>
		<description>I much agree with the above statement. I already ditch ads I have no wish to view or be distracted by. It is a mistaken idea that ads sell things. Especially in today&#039;s world. Ads have become far more than distracting, they&#039;ve become intrusive while they seek to capture the viewers attention. So much so that they are visual obstacles to seeing what you wish.

Rapidly they went from just a distraction to ranking with the pest industries for dislike. Many of the content providers say that they are necessary for assistance in providing cost support. That still doesn&#039;t mean that the computer user has to put up with them or the popup. There are far too many programs out that remove these eyesores. 

Perhaps what I do is a forerunner for other folks to come. When I go to a store, I don&#039;t look for what is advertised. I don&#039;t look for what is right in front of my eyes. Both placement on the shelf and advertising increase the cost of the product but not necessarily the value of it. Nor do I wish to reward those whose behavior I detest. As a consequence, I look elsewhere for those products I know work, are a true value for the money in comparison to national brands that usually aren&#039;t. I also listen to those that will readily tell you what works for them, if you simply ask. Everyone is willing to tell you of the good deal or the better product rather than what is told to you in ad form. It&#039;s called personal recommendation, it&#039;s free advertisement, and you get far better advice than from ads. 

The commercial world has become far to money hungry. I won&#039;t support those that I have a problem with. My dollar is a vote and I don&#039;t vote for what I don&#039;t like. There is no such animal as the lessor evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much agree with the above statement. I already ditch ads I have no wish to view or be distracted by. It is a mistaken idea that ads sell things. Especially in today&#8217;s world. Ads have become far more than distracting, they&#8217;ve become intrusive while they seek to capture the viewers attention. So much so that they are visual obstacles to seeing what you wish.</p>
<p>Rapidly they went from just a distraction to ranking with the pest industries for dislike. Many of the content providers say that they are necessary for assistance in providing cost support. That still doesn&#8217;t mean that the computer user has to put up with them or the popup. There are far too many programs out that remove these eyesores. </p>
<p>Perhaps what I do is a forerunner for other folks to come. When I go to a store, I don&#8217;t look for what is advertised. I don&#8217;t look for what is right in front of my eyes. Both placement on the shelf and advertising increase the cost of the product but not necessarily the value of it. Nor do I wish to reward those whose behavior I detest. As a consequence, I look elsewhere for those products I know work, are a true value for the money in comparison to national brands that usually aren&#8217;t. I also listen to those that will readily tell you what works for them, if you simply ask. Everyone is willing to tell you of the good deal or the better product rather than what is told to you in ad form. It&#8217;s called personal recommendation, it&#8217;s free advertisement, and you get far better advice than from ads. </p>
<p>The commercial world has become far to money hungry. I won&#8217;t support those that I have a problem with. My dollar is a vote and I don&#8217;t vote for what I don&#8217;t like. There is no such animal as the lessor evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9338/comment-page-1#comment-64385</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-64385</guid>
		<description>Yes, more ad-supported content, please. That way we can just use programs/scripts/whatever to ditch the ads and have everything for free, minus the P2P sue &#039;em all hype scare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, more ad-supported content, please. That way we can just use programs/scripts/whatever to ditch the ads and have everything for free, minus the P2P sue &#8216;em all hype scare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
