As for Nikki and Sharman networks initiating this suit, I’m baffled, it’s possibly the worst corporate decision since sony decided to put that rootkit onto their cd’s. What were they thinking?

Now desperation is seeking in.

He’s lying.

( note John, not Jon, as always. )

Funny, that’s precisely what it is about.

” i think you should concentrate on presenting p2pnews and let the big guns duke it out after all ordinary folk are like ants to these people and they wont hesitate to step on you. ”

That’s precisely why this should go to the end.
To demonstrate, once and for all, that they can’t be allowed
to step on ANYONE, big or small.

“also suggest you make registration compulsary so if anyone else makes libelous comments you can comply with the lawyers requests for information on the individual after all you dont want to end up shit creek again without a paddle, do yourself a favour and keep ip records at the very minimum.if someone made detailed libelous comments about me on this site or wherever i would sue them or the site owner for deliberately not keeping records. ”

Look, Gachnar,
As shown before, no libelous comments have been made, and it
is a meritless suit, but you know that.
As Jon has said, no records are kept nor will they ever be kept.
Not keeping those records is precisely what keeps sites like this
from being “up shit creek”

You are a liar and a repeat troll.
You have herpes, and bad breath.
Your mom is a hooker.

Sue me, I WELCOME IT.

See , you are anonymous.
No one is harmed unless they know who you REALLY are
You sue me, Everyone will know who you are, and the damage
is done to you, by YOU.

Kind of like THIS case.
The story she is suing over was repeated at many sites, all over
the web, and had been pretty much forgotten about.
Then, they decided to sue THIS site over all of the others, where
similar anonymous opinions were posted. No one would be talking
about her at all if SHE HERSELF hadn’t created the situation.

NO IP records will ever be kept here, so no one ,no matter how
wealthy, can force any one to reveal what they don’t have ..
period.

Posters here will never have to worry about that.

ever.

Lets have it fair and square on your site. You are a p2p site and yet the biggest story of the week has hardly been mentioned here.
The court hearing against Streamcast- every major paper has picked it up!
What does it mean to p2p?
What does it mean to you who depend on their support?
How about a feature on the hearing!
Sounds like the judge said its over and Baker their main lawyer (I assume) has said it looks like they will lose. That could be in a week!-
Whats the future of p2p if Streamcast loses a multi million dollar judgment?

C’mon jON, WE KNOW THEY SUPPORT YOU, (and love them for that) BUT LETS HAVE A STORY!!

No, I don’t think she will.

If it was such a sure “win”, Sharman wouldn’t have
decided to hide in the background.

I think it’s all over, she’s just too stupid to admit it.

3 posts in a row saying .. quit Jon .. Give up Jon .. you can’t Wiiiin Jon ….

That tells me that Jon has them on the ropes for sure.

“Don’t you think it might be interesting to see what we could achieve together in a positive instead of negative way?”

Do you really need someone like that in your life? I wouldn’t. Nothing positive in people like that who look to profit by destroying someone else, or someones home based small business. Which is what she tried to do for pursuing this since the begining.

My opinion.

Luv…

maybe that PERSON HAS already donated. HAVE YOU thought of that?!?!?!????!!!!

you, or someone else, have posted this type of message several times in the past. and you know what? it’s STILL NONE of YOUR BUSINESS!!!!!!!

have YOU DONATED?!?!?!?!?!?! why don’t you prove it then instead of posting anonymously? oh that’s right. because everyone here has the right to anonymity and no-one here has the right to question that.

i’ll tell you…i have not donated, and probably won’t. and jon knows why. but YOU don’t need to know why.

get it?

please stop asking this question and flaming people in this way. my “flames” above were meant tongue-in-cheek and not to be taken as flames, but as a take-off on your postins.

just go on with whatever you can do to pass the word around, nicely.

– js.

You are so naive that you have still left open the door for Nikki Hemming to become a good person. Do you not see the fundamental rottenness of her?

I think for all your hype here Nikki has still won because your original links remain self-censored and unavailable. Meanwhile the lawsuit against you continues. The links are:
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8678
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8699

If you want to be courageous and to actually start winning against Hemming, then restore those links or repost those articles along with their offending comments.