<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Number One (spam source)</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-72904</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-72904</guid>
		<description>Hey, JON, this is an instance where you DO need to delete that thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, JON, this is an instance where you DO need to delete that thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71609</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71609</guid>
		<description>He's baaaaaack!!! :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s baaaaaack!!! <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71269</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71269</guid>
		<description>Being in the IT field you have probably seen a program called Spybot Search &#038; Destroy. If you haven't Google them and learn about them. They had a big problem about a year or so ago by being hacked. They had 'fixed' mirror sites stationed around the world for people to download updates on. Now they move those site around...ALOT...to keep the hackers from stopping the updates. They also have sites like the CNET network offer their program for download. If you make your program downloadable from a LOT of sources and move your mirror sites around like SbS&#038;D does you should have no problems. I do believe, however, that you should have kept mum about your anti-spam program until it hit the market. You just let 'them' know you're coming after them, therefore warning them of your presence. Remember, "To be forwarned is to be fore ARMED!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in the IT field you have probably seen a program called Spybot Search &#038; Destroy. If you haven&#8217;t Google them and learn about them. They had a big problem about a year or so ago by being hacked. They had &#8216;fixed&#8217; mirror sites stationed around the world for people to download updates on. Now they move those site around&#8230;ALOT&#8230;to keep the hackers from stopping the updates. They also have sites like the CNET network offer their program for download. If you make your program downloadable from a LOT of sources and move your mirror sites around like SbS&#038;D does you should have no problems. I do believe, however, that you should have kept mum about your anti-spam program until it hit the market. You just let &#8216;them&#8217; know you&#8217;re coming after them, therefore warning them of your presence. Remember, &#8220;To be forwarned is to be fore ARMED!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71268</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71268</guid>
		<description>Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71267</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71267</guid>
		<description>you obviously are not in the IT world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you obviously are not in the IT world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71109</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-71109</guid>
		<description>The SpammerSkewer client program will use a peer to peer networking protocol to redistribute cryptographically signed instruction files.  These instruction files tell the SpammerSkewer client how to complain on the spamvertised website.  The only point that is vulnerable to attack will be the website from which this program can be downloaded.  By the time the peer network is seeded and enough publicity is reached, I will also distribute the program via peer to peer networks such as gnutella. 


I wanted to have the program done at the first of August, but the imbedded image tactic used by spammers is causing me to have to add code that will allow manual complaint submission as well.  I am including this feature so that not only will people be able to automatically drag and drop text based spam, but will also be able to submit complaints for fax, sms, blog, and other types of spam.  By resorting to new tactics such as image embedding, spammers have only forced me to increase the the types of spam that will generate complaints.  Computer programs may not be able to read many types of embedded images, but people viewing these images will be able to pick out a spamvertised site from a list.  Each time a spamvertised site is selected from this list, an individual complaint will be generated.  I understand that there is a possibility for spam victims to resort to sending multiple complaints for each spam, but this is unavoidable since spammers have forced me to add this list selection feature.  It is my hope that spam victims take the high road and submit only one complaint to the appropriate site for each spam received. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SpammerSkewer client program will use a peer to peer networking protocol to redistribute cryptographically signed instruction files.  These instruction files tell the SpammerSkewer client how to complain on the spamvertised website.  The only point that is vulnerable to attack will be the website from which this program can be downloaded.  By the time the peer network is seeded and enough publicity is reached, I will also distribute the program via peer to peer networks such as gnutella. </p>
<p>I wanted to have the program done at the first of August, but the imbedded image tactic used by spammers is causing me to have to add code that will allow manual complaint submission as well.  I am including this feature so that not only will people be able to automatically drag and drop text based spam, but will also be able to submit complaints for fax, sms, blog, and other types of spam.  By resorting to new tactics such as image embedding, spammers have only forced me to increase the the types of spam that will generate complaints.  Computer programs may not be able to read many types of embedded images, but people viewing these images will be able to pick out a spamvertised site from a list.  Each time a spamvertised site is selected from this list, an individual complaint will be generated.  I understand that there is a possibility for spam victims to resort to sending multiple complaints for each spam, but this is unavoidable since spammers have forced me to add this list selection feature.  It is my hope that spam victims take the high road and submit only one complaint to the appropriate site for each spam received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-69854</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-69854</guid>
		<description>Um where's Russia? We're supposed to believe that Russia isn't in the top five? Likely story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um where&#8217;s Russia? We&#8217;re supposed to believe that Russia isn&#8217;t in the top five? Likely story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-69370</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-69370</guid>
		<description>Hopefully it will be completely non centralized, otherwise the spammers will shut it down just like they did to Blue Frog.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Frog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully it will be completely non centralized, otherwise the spammers will shut it down just like they did to Blue Frog.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Frog" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Frog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68772</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68772</guid>
		<description>The spam that contains embedded images are used to bypass spam filters and spammer attack programs.  A new program is being created that will allow spam victims to fight back and punish spammers.  This program is going to be called Spammer Skewer.  It should be available as a beta early August this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spam that contains embedded images are used to bypass spam filters and spammer attack programs.  A new program is being created that will allow spam victims to fight back and punish spammers.  This program is going to be called Spammer Skewer.  It should be available as a beta early August this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68762</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68762</guid>
		<description>How many time have viewers been annoyed by the pop-up banners that appear on Turner channels during the airing of a show.  I am not talking about the advertisements that appear during regular commercial breaks, but rather the pop-up banners appearing at the botton of the screen during the movie or show.  These have become so annoying that I no longer view Turner channels.  I have also let Turner broadcasting know why they have lost at least one viewer.  Here is an email that I fired off to tbsinfo@turner.com :

     I have tried several times to watch TBS, TNT, and other Turner channels.  
Just tonight I started to watch "Phone Booth" on TNT.  Commercials not only 
took too much of the viewing time, but they were also popping up on the 
screen during the time the movie was playing.  "30 Days" ads or banners 
popping up on the bottom of the screen are very annoying.  This may now be 
the standard practice for TBS as well as other Turner stations, but it is not 
appreciated by many.  

    People who subscribe to cable or satelite packages pay good money to be 
able to watch TBS.  I'm sure that most want to watch movies or shows free of 
pop-up ads at the bottom.  While I can see that these pop-up are there to 
make people aware of other shows, the regular advertisements during 
commercial breaks produce adequate awareness.  Saturating television screens  
over and over with ads, banners, pop-ups, etc just annoys most of your 
audiance. 

I do know that videos that are created for Internet use do not have these 
annoying pop-ups.  Most of these Internet videos are free for downloading and 
many are quite entertaining.  There are quite a few people who are extremely 
annoyed at your advertising techniques.  While most do not take the time to 
write, they may be quite happy when they find alternative ways to get content 
that your channels carry.   Just be careful that you do not price and 
advertise TBS out of a viewing audiance.  I no longer have TNT, TBS, and 
other Turner channels on my favorites list.

I encourage all those who read this post to also complain to Turner about this advertisement policy and also let them know that there are alternatives. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many time have viewers been annoyed by the pop-up banners that appear on Turner channels during the airing of a show.  I am not talking about the advertisements that appear during regular commercial breaks, but rather the pop-up banners appearing at the botton of the screen during the movie or show.  These have become so annoying that I no longer view Turner channels.  I have also let Turner broadcasting know why they have lost at least one viewer.  Here is an email that I fired off to <a href="mailto:tbsinfo@turner.com">tbsinfo@turner.com</a> :</p>
<p>     I have tried several times to watch TBS, TNT, and other Turner channels.<br />
Just tonight I started to watch &#8220;Phone Booth&#8221; on TNT.  Commercials not only<br />
took too much of the viewing time, but they were also popping up on the<br />
screen during the time the movie was playing.  &#8220;30 Days&#8221; ads or banners<br />
popping up on the bottom of the screen are very annoying.  This may now be<br />
the standard practice for TBS as well as other Turner stations, but it is not<br />
appreciated by many.  </p>
<p>    People who subscribe to cable or satelite packages pay good money to be<br />
able to watch TBS.  I&#8217;m sure that most want to watch movies or shows free of<br />
pop-up ads at the bottom.  While I can see that these pop-up are there to<br />
make people aware of other shows, the regular advertisements during<br />
commercial breaks produce adequate awareness.  Saturating television screens<br />
over and over with ads, banners, pop-ups, etc just annoys most of your<br />
audiance. </p>
<p>I do know that videos that are created for Internet use do not have these<br />
annoying pop-ups.  Most of these Internet videos are free for downloading and<br />
many are quite entertaining.  There are quite a few people who are extremely<br />
annoyed at your advertising techniques.  While most do not take the time to<br />
write, they may be quite happy when they find alternative ways to get content<br />
that your channels carry.   Just be careful that you do not price and<br />
advertise TBS out of a viewing audiance.  I no longer have TNT, TBS, and<br />
other Turner channels on my favorites list.</p>
<p>I encourage all those who read this post to also complain to Turner about this advertisement policy and also let them know that there are alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68573</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9434#comment-68573</guid>
		<description>The US has always been the #1 spam source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has always been the #1 spam source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
