Comments on: Free speech at Skutt School http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9436 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9436/comment-page-1#comment-69582 Reader's Write Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:05:08 +0000 #comment-69582 Also in the article it states that... "That opinion showed up in June on www.wikipedia.org. And Skutt officials say there have been three other objectionable entries since February. They include sharp criticism of Skutt principal Patrick Slattery, obscene language and a note about drug use by students." Also in the article it states that…

“That opinion showed up in June on http://www.wikipedia.org. And Skutt officials say there have been three other objectionable entries since February. They include sharp criticism of Skutt principal Patrick Slattery, obscene language and a note about drug use by students.”

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9436/comment-page-1#comment-69488 Reader's Write Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:48:41 +0000 #comment-69488 With all the publicity over child sexual predation by religious sects it does make one wonder, "What do they have to hide?" With all the publicity over child sexual predation by religious sects it does make one wonder, “What do they have to hide?”

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9436/comment-page-1#comment-68662 Reader's Write Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:07:05 +0000 #comment-68662 These stories really need to contain the aleged "libelous information" so readers can judge for themselves. The public has a right to know. What if the supposedly libelous information is true and the school is simply using a lawsuit to suppress it? These stories really need to contain the aleged “libelous information” so readers can judge for themselves. The public has a right to know. What if the supposedly libelous information is true and the school is simply using a lawsuit to suppress it?

]]>