<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD cuts processor prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442/comment-page-1#comment-69875</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69875</guid>
		<description>so AMD has been bilking us for how long? If they really wanted to own Intel they would have done this ages ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so AMD has been bilking us for how long? If they really wanted to own Intel they would have done this ages ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442/comment-page-1#comment-69622</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69622</guid>
		<description>I got an Athlon XP 1700 back in early 2003 that still runs faster than some processors today. The XP 1700 runs at about 1450Mhz. Mine has been running stable for 3 years at 2350Mhz. Needless to say I&#039;ve been very pleased with it. It only cost $90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an Athlon XP 1700 back in early 2003 that still runs faster than some processors today. The XP 1700 runs at about 1450Mhz. Mine has been running stable for 3 years at 2350Mhz. Needless to say I&#8217;ve been very pleased with it. It only cost $90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442/comment-page-1#comment-69469</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69469</guid>
		<description>AMDs are *much* more reliable in the long run. I have AMDs that are over five years old that hum right along. The only Pentium (4) I had fried in less than eight months!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMDs are *much* more reliable in the long run. I have AMDs that are over five years old that hum right along. The only Pentium (4) I had fried in less than eight months!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442/comment-page-1#comment-69369</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69369</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the &quot;dreaded C word&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the &#8220;dreaded C word&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


