<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD cuts processor prices</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69875</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69875</guid>
		<description>so AMD has been bilking us for how long? If they really wanted to own Intel they would have done this ages ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so AMD has been bilking us for how long? If they really wanted to own Intel they would have done this ages ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69622</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69622</guid>
		<description>I got an Athlon XP 1700 back in early 2003 that still runs faster than some processors today. The XP 1700 runs at about 1450Mhz. Mine has been running stable for 3 years at 2350Mhz. Needless to say I've been very pleased with it. It only cost $90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an Athlon XP 1700 back in early 2003 that still runs faster than some processors today. The XP 1700 runs at about 1450Mhz. Mine has been running stable for 3 years at 2350Mhz. Needless to say I&#8217;ve been very pleased with it. It only cost $90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69469</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69469</guid>
		<description>AMDs are *much* more reliable in the long run. I have AMDs that are over five years old that hum right along. The only Pentium (4) I had fried in less than eight months!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMDs are *much* more reliable in the long run. I have AMDs that are over five years old that hum right along. The only Pentium (4) I had fried in less than eight months!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69369</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9442#comment-69369</guid>
		<description>What's the "dreaded C word" ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the &#8220;dreaded C word&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
