Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA, MPAA: the same con

p2pnet.net News:- After six months of trying to nail California’s Tammie Marson for alleged copyright infringement, the Big Four Organized Music cartel’s RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) finally had to abandon the case.

“As in all of the RIAA cases, the only basis the RIAA had for its claim against Mrs. Marson was that she paid for the internet access and owned the computer on which the shared files folder resided,” says Recording Industry vs The People, going on:

“Faced with evidence that numerous other people had access to the Internet connection and/or the computer and that any of those people could have engaged in the allegedly infringing conduct, the RIAA agreed to dismiss.”

Agreed? Like it had much of a choice.

RIVTP’s Ray Beckerman also points out that Marson’s legal team, headed up by Seyamack Kouretchian, is handling another p2p file sharing case, this time brought by the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) and featuring Shaw Hogan.

“Because (a) the Hogan case involves many of the same issues that arise in the RIAA cases, (b) the MPAA has been engaged in cartel-like behavior with the RIAA, and (c) Mr. Hogan (unliked most defendants in these cases) is a litigant who is in a position to fight back, thereby increasing the likelihood of a full and fair airing of the copyright law issues, we are initiating coverage of that case in our index of litigation documents, although it does not directly involve the RIAA),” he adds.

Hogan says one of the allegations the MPAA is making is, “that I’m more or less destroying the movie industry because I allegedly downloaded a movie that I own”.

Also See:
Recording Industry vs The People – RIAA Discontinued Case in California, Virgin v. Marson, July 27, 2006
featuring Shaw HoganShawn Hogan vs the MPAA, July 26, 2006


p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

One Response to “RIAA, MPAA: the same con”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Surely RIAA members should pay for the legal expenses incurred by the victim of the frivolous “shared directory” acusation. Right?

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®