<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA attacks Vietnam vet</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-98694</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-98694</guid>
		<description> slt!

 ça prouve bien que leur seul but est de faire payer les gens un point c'est tout

 meme mort ils nous harcelent pour une musique, riaa et mpaa viennent de montrer leur vrai visage, cupidité sans pitié, ni aucun respect pour la dignité humaine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slt!</p>
<p> ça prouve bien que leur seul but est de faire payer les gens un point c&#8217;est tout</p>
<p> meme mort ils nous harcelent pour une musique, riaa et mpaa viennent de montrer leur vrai visage, cupidité sans pitié, ni aucun respect pour la dignité humaine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97444</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97444</guid>
		<description>catflap  meant that he use the bigger one as the source for his resized version. he used the small one as source and blow it up in stead the other way round.
Using the bigger one you can easily create a clearer picture with less blurr in less filesize!
see:
http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=larryscantleburysmallva0.jpg


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catflap  meant that he use the bigger one as the source for his resized version. he used the small one as source and blow it up in stead the other way round.<br />
Using the bigger one you can easily create a clearer picture with less blurr in less filesize!<br />
see:<br />
<a href="http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=larryscantleburysmallva0.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=larryscantleburysmallva0.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97412</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97412</guid>
		<description>The fraudulant lawsuits for profit are rising to the level of revolution. Because they have money they have decided they can take it through the courts from innocent people. Time to change from the court forum and take it out into the streets. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fraudulant lawsuits for profit are rising to the level of revolution. Because they have money they have decided they can take it through the courts from innocent people. Time to change from the court forum and take it out into the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97410</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97410</guid>
		<description>why? that looks like the same picture.

the one you link to is too big. jon has a limited amount of space for pictures at the top of a story.

even some of the pictures i send to him for my own articles need to be resized to fit the area, and although i think they might look better larger, i live with the size restrictions and try to send himn ones that will fit without him having to resize them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why? that looks like the same picture.</p>
<p>the one you link to is too big. jon has a limited amount of space for pictures at the top of a story.</p>
<p>even some of the pictures i send to him for my own articles need to be resized to fit the area, and although i think they might look better larger, i live with the size restrictions and try to send himn ones that will fit without him having to resize them. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97345</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97345</guid>
		<description>The RIAA's cottage industry created by volunteer software developers is ironic.  Should be included in new business models for the Digital Age.  I'm referring to their realization that p2p networks make it possible for individual empowerment to replace customary business media distribution channels, rendering corporations obsolete, per se.  The cottage industry consists of suing individuals that cannot afford our country's legal system.  

What's more interesting, is the ability of power brokers to continue to repress the obvious tactics under the guise of a legitimate, so-called excuse of "copyright infringement".  SLAPP suit: A Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, in which a corporation or developer sues an organization in an attempt to scare it into dropping protests against a corporate initiative. http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/term/1264241E-6BCC-41DE-88FB065B11543680

Maybe Scantlebury represents such an organization.  One that is within all members of the public.  Maybe he represents an organization of individuals that believes the law of copyright has run its' course.  That there is a new definition, one that no longer relies on the assumption that copyright is granted for limited times in order to provide creators with a means to continue their creativity and innovation.  Maybe this new definition of copyright will reflect our times, and explicitly acknowledge that creators have the Internet, and are able to create works without reliance on those works to provide economic return, especially in the Arts and Sciences.

http://www.internet-defense.org/
Music Download Lawsuit - John Deep v. RIAA, Boies, et al.
Music Download Inventor Sues His Lawyer David Boies, Music Labels &#038; Movie Studios
http://www.internet-defense.org/

This is a lawsuit that pursues a strategy based on RICO law, i.e., extortion and racketeering.  Plug in Scantlebury's facts, and see if it reads about right.  In fact, plug in any of the fact scenarios of the victims of the RIAA's cottage industry, and see what you think?

It's time to call a SLAPP suit a SLAPP suit, and call the RIAA/MPAA/major recording and film studios what they are. . . . Criminals that need to be put in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RIAA&#8217;s cottage industry created by volunteer software developers is ironic.  Should be included in new business models for the Digital Age.  I&#8217;m referring to their realization that p2p networks make it possible for individual empowerment to replace customary business media distribution channels, rendering corporations obsolete, per se.  The cottage industry consists of suing individuals that cannot afford our country&#8217;s legal system.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s more interesting, is the ability of power brokers to continue to repress the obvious tactics under the guise of a legitimate, so-called excuse of &#8220;copyright infringement&#8221;.  SLAPP suit: A Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, in which a corporation or developer sues an organization in an attempt to scare it into dropping protests against a corporate initiative. <a href="http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/term/1264241E-6BCC-41DE-88FB065B11543680" rel="nofollow">http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/term/1264241E-6BCC-41DE-88FB065B11543680</a></p>
<p>Maybe Scantlebury represents such an organization.  One that is within all members of the public.  Maybe he represents an organization of individuals that believes the law of copyright has run its&#8217; course.  That there is a new definition, one that no longer relies on the assumption that copyright is granted for limited times in order to provide creators with a means to continue their creativity and innovation.  Maybe this new definition of copyright will reflect our times, and explicitly acknowledge that creators have the Internet, and are able to create works without reliance on those works to provide economic return, especially in the Arts and Sciences.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.internet-defense.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.internet-defense.org/</a><br />
Music Download Lawsuit - John Deep v. RIAA, Boies, et al.<br />
Music Download Inventor Sues His Lawyer David Boies, Music Labels &#038; Movie Studios<br />
<a href="http://www.internet-defense.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.internet-defense.org/</a></p>
<p>This is a lawsuit that pursues a strategy based on RICO law, i.e., extortion and racketeering.  Plug in Scantlebury&#8217;s facts, and see if it reads about right.  In fact, plug in any of the fact scenarios of the victims of the RIAA&#8217;s cottage industry, and see what you think?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to call a SLAPP suit a SLAPP suit, and call the RIAA/MPAA/major recording and film studios what they are. . . . Criminals that need to be put in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97309</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/9568#comment-97309</guid>
		<description>jon, please use the bigger picture that he has in his picture gallary available. thats better for your post

http://ec3.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/91/95/0105a2c008a08facb35d5010.L.jpg

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jon, please use the bigger picture that he has in his picture gallary available. thats better for your post</p>
<p><a href="http://ec3.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/91/95/0105a2c008a08facb35d5010.L.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ec3.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/91/95/0105a2c008a08facb35d5010.L.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
