Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

No googling, says Google

p2pnet.net News:- Google used to be a fun company run by fun people with good Net manners, and good intentions.

With Do No Evil as its motto, it quickly attracted a huge following of devoted admirer/users and Google the name became google the verb – to google, meaning to search for something online.

Good for Google? Apparently not. It’s, “fired off a series of legal letters to media organisations, warning them against using its name as a verb,” says The Independent, going on to quote a spokesman as stating, “‘We think it’s important to make the distinction between using the word Google to describe using Google to search the internet, and using the word Google to describe searching the internet. It has some serious trademark issues.”

And it may be right, say reports.

“Google spells out its verb case scenario,” says Silicon.com, quoting linguistics expert Dr Julie Coleman as saying, “The prestige associated with a trademark is lost if people use it generically, so I do see Google’s point. They also do lots more than just search, so maybe they’re reluctant for their brand name to be restricted in this way.”

And, “The risk for Google is that it ceases to become a brand altogether,” says Out-Law.com. “If it becomes generic, the brand can be struck from the register of trade marks, leaving the owner without rights. This has happened before: escalator, aspirin, pogo, gramophone and linoleum were once registered trade marks that became victims of genericide.”

Meanwhile, to google is also coming to mean something else: to ‘censor’.

Also See:
The IndependentTo google or not to google? It’s a legal question, August 14, 2006
Silicon.comWants everybody to stop ‘googling’…, August 14, 2006
Out-Law.comWhy Google is right to rebuke brand abuse, August 14, 2006
to ‘censor’China Net censors named, August 14, 2006


p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

2 Responses to “No googling, says Google”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Adobe tried this – http://www.pcpro.co.uk/macuser/columns/53126 – it doesn’t seem to have had much effect.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    “They also do lots more than just search, so maybe they’re reluctant for their brand name to be restricted in this way”

    Froogle – Search for items to buy
    Google Groups – Search through newgroup posts
    Google Maps – Search for locations
    Google Video – Search through uploaded videos
    ad nauseum…

    Bit of a theme going on at Google

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®