Ringtones and the 6% solution
p2pnet.net News:- Fourteen months after its hearing of the inaugural “ringtones” tariff filed by SOCAN, and based upon a lengthy interrogatory process that began in 2003 and during which a major party (that happened to be my client) withdrew, a three member panel, including the Chair, of the five person Copyright Board has certified SOCAN’s Tariff 24 for Ringtones at a base rate of 6% of the price paid by the subscriber for the ringtone, net of any network usage fees with a minimum of $0.06.
This tariff was strenuously resisted on several grounds, the most important of which was that the objectors believed that there was no legal liability. It was argued that the mechanism for selling ring tones was functionally no different than the delivery of a CD containing the ringtone file to the consumer – and that it was thus not a communication “to the public”, i.e. there is no “tapping into” on ongoing performance.
As I post, the reasons have finally appeared online.
An update will follow. This decision will be very important in several other pending matters.
We will try to assess whether this is a 6% solution or the beginning of more judicial review and controversy, with significant impact well beyond your cellular telephone bill.
Howard Knopf – Excess Copyright
[Knopf is an Ottawa-based copyright lawyer who's been lead counsel on legal challenges both at the Copyright Board and in the Courts against the excesses of the music industry establishment. He's regularly quoted in the mainstream media and acted against CRIA in the file sharing litigation, and continues to act against the CPCC, in which CRIA is still a major stakeholder, on the levy front.]
Also See:
EFF – Another DMCA Misuse: Macrovision v. Sima, August 15, 2006
p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
August 21st, 2006 at 1:35 pm
i dont get it…. its early though