Comments on: New RIAA p2p blunder

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:43:31 +0000

If I was Mr Wilke I’d countersue for time and damages to the tune of about a million dollars. This was basically a sloppy, groundless lawsuit with near-zero merit, and the RIAA should pay through the nose for it. It’s amazing it ever got to court in the first place. I mean, rally- using *screenshots* as “proof”? Puh-lease. They should be forced to compensate this guy big-time.

Kelly K. - Supervised Visitation - http://svdirectory.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:39:16 +0000

And once again the RIAA steps on their own dick. How can they be so incompetent as to get his NAME wrong? Can you possibly trust a group like the RIAA that makes mistakes this egregious? Incredible.

Mike
http://quicktrivia.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 11 Sep 2006 03:12:09 +0000

http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/09/riaa-says-that-without-pretrial.html

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:12:28 +0000

if they got his name wrong… he should just ignore the lawsuit… its not like they are suing him.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:26:38 +0000

Thousands have caved in and settled, guilty or not.

This guy didn’t, so props to him.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:57:45 +0000

I’m sure that there must be a law that prohibits the spying on someone’s computer, for whatever reason.

Just as no one can search people’s luggge at the train station just because you are sure that one of the luggages or even a specific one may have something that was stolen from you, you are not allowed to search other’s computer to see what they have in it, unless the owner of the computer authorizes it. To do a search of the luggages you have to get the proper law enforcemetn organization to do it.

And guess what. If youl told the law enforcement organization that the search is for illegal copies of songs, they will not bother to d any search.

It is time that law enforcement be done by law enforcement organizations and not some wild vigilantes or bounty hunters.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:25:07 +0000

This sort of happens with an increasing regularity. While many can not afford “justice” to clear their names, which the **AA’s know and are taking advantage of, more and more as time goes by we are hearing of those that can afford to say the **AA’s are full of hockey and are willing to fight it as the number of lawsuits increase. Well it was bound to happen that at some point they would start losing it on those that can not afford it and hit those that can.

It is through the avenue of those saying they are wrong that word will get out to the courts that all is not as they state. That it is not a slam dunk, open closed case, and that many are wrongfully accused. I suspect that if they had to prove to the “beyond a shadow of a doubt” instead of civil courts likelyhood requirements that they would not have a leg to stand on with many of the cases pending and they know it.

Still hardly a word will be heard in mainstream media and the spin masters of the cartels will once again walk off spouting some sort of nonsense about victory, even when facts say otherwise.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch. I await the day the cartels are begging for someone to please listen to what they have to offer rather than the high horse they now pretend to sit on.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:05:09 +0000

I hope he sues them back. There must be something he can get them for. Any lawyers got any ideas?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:47:27 +0000

I hope he tries to recover his attorney fees.

Rick