By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:09:22 +0000

The one thing any college should remember is that the RIAA also files fraudulant complaints and sues people who didn’t downnload. Should the college decide to assist in suits against mis-identified persons, the colllege as well can be sued. Of course, no one beleives that innocent people are being sued and no one will stand up for those persons while the RIAA collects money from the innocent. Fraudulant suits for profit. That is what it is when the wrong person was targeted. That is illegal.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:31:43 +0000

If copywright laws had not been turned into the black sludge it is, just think what the common pool would look like, a large part of the problems we have now would never have happened. The major players would be contibuting to the common good of this country, instead the current laws makes parasites out of copywright holders, no DRM on the commons, reset copywright to default like the founders fathers had it. I believe the time frame was described as limited. In short: 1710 act established the principles of authors’ ownership of copyright and a fixed term of protection of copyrighted works (fourteen years, and renewable for fourteen more if the author was alive upon expiration). The statute prevented a monopoly on the part of the booksellers and created a “public domain” for literature by limiting terms of copyright and by ensuring that once a work was purchased the copyright owner no longer had control over its use. or publisher. )
These people had the forsite to see what was coming, our goverment set there and let this happen, I think the focus of all the sites should includ the revision of copywright law to resemble the original document

Comments on: RIAA video debacle

By: Reader's Write

By: Reader's Write