Comments on: eDonkey goes down

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:59:16 +0000

Because Racketeers Industry Assoc of America aka RIAA loses their f…ng money$.So they about to apply racket and repressions instead of market methods.In fact RIAA are real gangsters “in the law”.

Let’s admit eMule rocks in network previously named ed2k.Goodbye, MetaMachine.Making business on P2P is strange idea.It is we, users who really owns the net.It is our PCs and our bandwith.So, we do not have to cry about MetaMachine.That’s their choice and their fate.But nobody can defeat “all”.So we will share.No matter what RIAA invents, they will lose this battle again and again.In worst case, P2P networks will just go completely untraceable, anonimous and using virtualized IDs with proxying to deny any traffic analisys, sources tracking and hence punishment.This will reduce efficiency a bit but will increase anonimity instead

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:12:27 +0000

” Only a genius could have come up with this innovative and revolutionary legal theory, ”

Shamefully, this is not really ‘theory’.

Around the world it is now a Business Model.

Hire a few folks to do nothing but comb the Web, and use P2P
clients to look for …..

1. Potentially infringing ( even marginally so ) content
2. Any disparaging opinion to the large business.
3. If the disparaging opinion is founf on a competitors site,
automatic bonus.

Use the full weight of your capital to sue anyone meeting the
above criterion, as long as you know they are not financially able
to defend themselves.

Profit from summary judgements
Watch the smaller competitors crumble due to bankruptcy.
Eliminate by financial censorship any and all new or comments
about such activities.

It’s a marvelous system, developed in the US, but now used by
wealthy monopolies in other countries as well.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:29:03 +0000

I think you need to relax and re-read the article again. They’ve done the same thing before to scare people. It’s “bullshit” as the article says!

huds601

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:00:53 +0000

wtf is illegal sharing?

(5th attempt to post)

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:14:32 +0000

Isnt the definition of insanity doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result - this will make no difference to file sharing levels at all, its just another example of corporate stupidty - we have now over $330 million worth of them and not one cent to the artists… poor old Sam the Man down the loo with the rest of em…

License file sharing users and put us out of your misery.

The network will keep going for years and years despite this and dont forget mutell and frostwire.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:00:09 +0000

Now I’m not saying illegal file sharing is ok, but the RIAA seriously needs to be shutdown.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:24:41 +0000

“Courts around the world - including the United States Supreme Court - have ruled that businesses and individuals can be prosecuted for illegal downloading.”

Only a genius could have come up with this innovative and revolutionary legal theory, that individuals can be prosecuted to acting illegally.

Strange that no one yet, of the millions of downloaders out there, has been prosecuted, let alone found guilty nor burned at the stake. And for copying music? Must be joking.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:37:59 +0000

What will happen to you ?
fap fap fap