I suppose …

If I had some rich doctors and lawyers following me around,
doing anything and everything that their money and power can
provide to destroy my life, I just might hide too.

So,
Nothing to fear … who are you then ??

>As for stalking…she is a self-confessed internet stalker.

I have stalked no one.

When two of Polevoy / Barrett’s Teammates made the destruction of my life their business, ever claiming that it was “personal” and not their propaganda businesses, I contacted their wives via polite emails.

I do not believe by any definition of the word this is stalking.

Details are here:

Andrew M Langer is one of Polevoy/Barrett’s Rag-tag Posse Members and spent months interrogating me and lying about my foundation before I contacted his wife. He claimed that it was personal … not in conjunction with his busienss as a Corporate PR flack … and he refused to leave me alone. Details are here.

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/langervsilena.html

Disbarred NY attorney, Mark S Probert, used fake names to attempt to infiltrate my support group and then called my home / office and threatened me.

Several years later, admittedly I waited longer than I should have, I emailed his wife with his frightening activities.

Details are here. BTW … he has repeatedly lied about his disbarrment.

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/sandraprobert.htm

To see them in cahoots with Polevoy (Coward beyond imagination), click here and visit their “Rag Tag Posse” … that’s why they proudly call themselves.

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm

So let me get this straight …
To prove she’s a stalker, you follow HER around in every thread,
and follow her at every site.

Stalking her, basically Dr.

Makes perfect sense.

ROFL

i see no “self confession” of stalking.
I only see you following her here , in nearly every thread
she posts in.

Calling her a “stalker” anonymously carries much less weight than
you actually stalking her does.

So, continue following her around in every thead.
You show just who and what you really are.

Coward and fool, Dr.

> Looks like you’re not only a stalker, you’re also a coward.

I am not a doctor, just one of her many victims. As for leaving her alone, she has stalked and harassed one man on Usenet for years. He has begged her to leave him alone, and she emailed his wife instead.

She is the coward, hiding in Costa Rica.

> Identify yourself, as she does.
> MAYBE, you’ll have some credibility.

1) Do not assume that a doctor is the only one who Rosenthal has defamed. Her victims are many. Her defamatory web pages are legion.

2) When dealing with a self confessed stalker such as rosenthal, maintaining anonymity is always a wise move. She has contacted wives of men who do not accept her abuse and implied that these men have a purient interest in her.

3) Complaining that anonymity lessens credibility when you remain anonymous demonstrates a logical defect in your “thinking”.

This woman on the other hand acted as an individual, not a service provider. Even if she posted something bad that was something someone else might have wrote, she was told it was wrong information and harmful. But she continued to repost it and that shows she didn’t care about what she was saying. It was very rude.

Try serving her legal notice for first person libel, not the third party libel she’s currently in litigation for. She’s performed plenty of it.

Somehow Ilena Rosenthal’s legal representers seem to believe the internet should be above the laws of common society. Yes, there should be Free Speech. But there should be ramnifications for libel on the net, just as there are for the news media, or any other public audience.

Slander, defamation, and libel can be harmful when it occurs. Ilena Rosenthal should not hide behind the untamed internet to continue her harm.

I can understand ISPs and net providers being concerned about repercussion from certain laws like this. However, the court in it’s good judgment, can continue to make slanders, defamers, and libelers guilty of the offenses they perpetrate, just as they always have in every other public venue. Once a perpetrator has been found guilty of such an act, the ISP or internet provider should be put on notice to remove any offensive webpages or material from their servers, or be found equally guilty of the offense.

Identify yourself, as she does.
MAYBE, you’ll have some credibility.

Looks like you’re not only a stalker, you’re also a coward.

However, she sued several people and AOL a few years back for EXACTLY THE BEHAVIOR SHE ENGAGES IN. She lost the case and was assessed court costs and attorney’s fees, which to date, she has not paid.

Instead, she has fled the United States to Costa Rica, to avoid legal process.

The article she gleefully reposted was written by Timothy Bolen, who is her co-defendant. He, like Rosenthal, threatens anyone who challenges him with a lawsuit. You can read the multiple threads in news.admin.net-abuse.email where his antics are discussed.

Rosenthal and Bolen proclaim themselves champions of free speech, while they will do anything they can to stifle those who disagree with them.

Rosenthal, thy name is H Y P O C R I T E.

His “publicists” hired a Private Investigator who staked out an ex partner’s of mine home in San Diego and was found dumpster diving where I receive my mail.

Then a couple of months later two of his publicists announced their arrival in Costa Rica …after Polevoy had been ranting on about my physical location for months.

Just months before that he was outed on Usenet donning the disguise of “Vera Teasdale” to continue his defamation of me and others he is suing …

For more …

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Polevoy.htm

Doesn’t it cost $50million for the necessary speech to get elected american president? Nothing free there.

Does it not it cost a fortune to beat a speech rap (called defamation)? Nothing free there.

Is it not true that in a court trial if you are not one of the lawyers, you may not talk to or ask a question to the judge? No free speech there either?

Is it not true that reporters cannot ask off topic questions to politicians at a press conference? No free speech here either.

Is it not true that you cannot ask a lady her age? No free speech here either.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

Isn’t that stalking ?

Tell us about “Vera Teasdale” Terror and how you donned her disguise to attack me and others in your insane suits until you foolishly posted your own email with her address. LOL

Tell us about all the people you’ve threatened to sue and have sued for posting the facts about you. YOU personify what you scream is “Libel Chill”… especially on your Healthfraud list where anyone who doesn’t toestep to the Healthfraud Regime Propaganda immediately gets censored and threatened.

Ilena Rosenthal
(log-in isn’t working … I’m not anonymous .. just can’t log-in.)

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Polevoy.htm

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Truehope.htm
Polevoy’s attempts to stop scientific research overturned

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm

For my work on raising awareness of the dangers of breast implants, (and the Propaganda Teams hired by Industry) please visit:

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

If Ms. Rosenthal was a McDonald’s restaurant starting out she’d have to erect a big sign in her front yard announcing to the world just how many people she has served with defamatory slings and arrows over the last decade on the internet.

Unfortunately, her views on reality don’t exactly seem to be correcting themselves since the lawsuit that she claims to be winning is far from over from.

Tens of thousands of posts, thousands of defamatory comments about individuals, institutions, organizations, just don’t seem to bother her. And it certainly doesn’t seem to bother the EFF, or the ACLU either.

She is a Usenet terrorist who blindly strikes out against anyone. She is obsessed without reason. And the major problem is that almost nobody in the press seems to care.