Comments on: BitTorrent embraces BS

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:39:39 +0000

Turning the internet into a tv-like situation where you can’t watch anything without some advertisement popping up every minute or two is the way forward? Definitely not agreed.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:25:22 +0000

Agreed. I think this is definitely the way forward.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:37:17 +0000

hey gachnar =)

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:34:13 +0000

this seems like a very sensible message to hollywood… why the hate p2pnet?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:31:57 +0000

The world is full of advertising. On TV, before movies, all over the internet. It doesn’t stop me doing what I want ’cause I can ignore it.

DRM DOES stop me doing what I want so I CAN’T ignore it.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:10:54 +0000

Is public view of BitTorrent interest and trust going west?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:40:25 +0000

As a technical person, I would like someone to explain the “magic” involved in a “DRM” system that doesn’t involve a tie between content and devices which treat the owners as an attacker of what they own. I don’t think the term “typically” applies here, as when a technical measure is used in some other way it is not appropriate to still call it DRM.

http://www.flora.ca/documents/digital-ownership.html